New Report Explains Why Jerry Jones Chose to Part Ways with Mike McCarthy

Many Cowboys fans were understandably upset with the decision. If the team wasn’t going to bring in a more experienced or higher-profile coach, why let McCarthy go?

ESPN’s Todd Archer provided some clarity on the situation Thursday. He reported that the main issue in negotiations between McCarthy and Jones was the length of the contract. While Jerry Jones wanted McCarthy to sign a three-year deal, the seasoned coach insisted on a five-year contract, which ultimately led to their separation.

“While no financial figures were discussed, the length of a proposed agreement was a sticking point. McCarthy was seeking a five-year deal, according to multiple sources, while Jones was sticking with three. At an impasse, both sides agreed it was time to move on.”

Todd Archer, ESPN

Jones’ preference for a shorter-term deal is understandable. With Dak Prescott signed for four more seasons, it makes sense that Jones might want the flexibility to re-evaluate the team’s direction in a few years.

However, Schottenheimer signed a four-year contract. Could the Cowboys and McCarthy not have found middle ground and agreed to a four-year deal that would align with Prescott’s hefty contract?

Opting to deny McCarthy his desired contract length, only to hire Schottenheimer, a less high-profile candidate, may seem risky for Jones. This decision likely reflects financial considerations and a desire to maintain ultimate control over the team.

While the move to hire a cheaper, lower-profile candidate like Schottenheimer may be criticized, it could be understood that Jones allowed McCarthy to leave for reasons rooted in both finances and authority.