July 5, 2024

Brandin Cooks would be shipped by the Cowboys to the Steelers in a proposed trade.

The Dallas Cowboys would part ways with one of their more seasoned players in a suggested trade scenario.

The Cowboys would send wide receiver Brandin Cooks to the Pittsburgh Steelers in return for a 2025 third-round draft pick, according to a suggested trade from Gary Davenport of Bleacher Report.

One major reason for the Cowboys to dump Cooks’ $8 million basic salary for the 2024 season, according to Davenport, is that they need to make room in the salary cap for CeeDee Lamb’s forthcoming contract.

Cooks is about to finish the last year of a $39.6 million, two-year contract deal he previously inked with the Houston Texans.

Cooks is about to finish the last year of a $39.6 million, two-year contract deal he previously inked with the Houston Texans.

However, Davenport notes, “trading Cooks after June 1 would clear $8 million off the Cowboys’ books—money that could be used to help extend Lamb.” Even though Cooks didn’t have a lot of yardage or catches in 2018, he still managed eight touchdowns and six seasons with 1,000 yards in the NFL. The best part is that Cooks is by far the most affordable wide receiver on this list.

Trade targets that are most “realistic” are those mentioned by Brandin Cooks.

The 30-year-old Cooks is not only incredibly cheap, but Davenport also makes the case that, out of the six trade candidates he lists in his piece, Cooks is the most “realistic.” Famous receivers like Deebo Samuel, Tee Higgins, DK Metcalf, Brandon Aiyuk, and Courtland Sutton are all mentioned by Davenport in addition to Cooks.

Given that Dallas Cowboys wide receiver Brandin Cooks is familiar with the experience of being dealt, Davenport speculates that this might be the most likely trade on the list.

As he begins his eleventh season of play, the 5-foot-10 Cooks is still a productive receiver. He just finished his debut season in Dallas with eight touchdowns, which is the second-highest number of receiving touchdowns he has ever caught in a single season. Cooks’ 54 receptions for 657 receiving yards surpassed the 418 receiving yards of former Dallas receiver Michael Gallup, who only managed 34 receptions and 418 receiving yards. Cooks’ touchdown total ranks second among all Cowboys players.

The Steelers, who are looking for a new starting wide receiver after moving Diontae Johnson to the Carolina Panthers, are regarded as a possible landing site. KOA’s Benjamin Allbright stated that the Steelers have made inquiries regarding Metcalf, Sutton, and Aiyuk.

On Tuesday, April 30, Allbright said, “They called about Aiyuk and Sutton and have been rebuffed, at least with opening talks.” “I spoke with DK, and I don’t think any trades would be made there until after June 1st, if any at all.”

Pittsburgh Steelers in Trade Link to $39 Million Cowboys Veteran

Why the Cowboys Are Unlikely to Trade Brandin Cooks

Although the trade of Cooks makes sense in terms of salary cap, it makes little sense in terms of personnel. Dallas is already thin in the wide receiver depth chart, especially with Gallup gone; they are banking on Jalen Tolbert to finally establish himself as the No. 3 receiver; additionally, they only used one draft pick on a wide receiver in Ryan Flournoy of Southeast Missouri State in the sixth round.

It is true that the Cowboys have been extremely frugal with their free agency spending this offseason because they are planning for Lamb’s future contracts as well as those of Dak Prescott and Micah Parsons.

Even though the Steelers would love to add Cooks as a cheap No. 2 alternative to George Pickens, they shouldn’t count on the Cowboys to bite because Cooks will be an asset to Lamb in 2024.

DJ Siddiqi covers the NFL for Heavy.com, concentrating on the Tampa Bay Buccaneers, Dallas Cowboys, Philadelphia Eagles, and Seattle Seahawks. Prior to joining Heavy, he covered the NFL and NBA for Bleacher Report, CBS Sports, ClutchPoints, Forbes, and 24/7 Sports.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *